One thing to keep in mind is that real estate valuers need to use a dedicated set of practices so they can create proper valuations fast and easy. Doing that will help safeguard the investor interest, and the entire set of results can be second to none in the end. Recently, the SISV and the SGX brought in a rather inquisitive situation. Is the current regulatory framework an adequate one, or are there any bad influences that make this thing not as good as it should be, to begin with?
The work of valuers is more pervasive than what a lot of people believe at this time. Valuations need to be precise, and a Singapore property has to be valued correctly. After all, valuations can be used in the case of public listings, financial reports, insurance, property acquisition or disposal and so on. The regulatory framework that governs over valuers is not as studied as it once was. The IRAS is a licensing body for the valuers and it issues licenses to them. On the other hand, the valuation profession is thoroughly represented by the SISV.



